Panasonic Lumix Review: A Reliable, Yet Outdated Camera
add_circle Pros
- Reliable and works flawlessly
- Decent image quality with good color reproduction
- Rotating LCD screen for easy viewing
- Simple menu system for easy navigation
- Plastic body with a solid build quality
remove_circle Contras
- Outdated and lacks advanced features
- Produces noise in low-light conditions
- Lacks an electronic shutter
- Resolution could be better
- No rubber grips or other ergonomic features
Galería










































































Editor's Summary
The Panasonic Lumix is a reliable, yet outdated camera that produces decent images. It has a plastic body, rotating LCD screen, and a simple menu system. However, it lacks an electronic shutter and produces noise in low-light conditions.
Introduction
I purchased this Panasonic Lumix in late August through Avito. I needed another micro 4/3 camera to replace my Olympus, which had a damaged cable. The prices for photography equipment are quite unreasonable, and I wouldn't consider buying a newer model at the moment. Therefore, I bought this one for 7,000 rubles with 14,653 shots.
Design and Build
The camera has a plastic body, which I find appealing. It's been around for a while, and there are some minor scratches, but they're almost imperceptible. There are no rubber grips, and nothing comes loose. The build quality is solid, with no creaks or play.
Features and Performance
The camera has a rotating LCD screen, which displays the image quite well, considering its age. The menu system can be a bit confusing due to the shortened labels, but I managed to find what I needed. There's also a button for the intelligent mode, which activates a blue backlight. It can be useful for quick settings adjustments, but I don't use it.
Image Quality
The camera produces decent images, with good color reproduction. However, the resolution could be better. It also tends to produce noise in low-light conditions, especially with weak lighting. The camera is outdated, and newer models are significantly more advanced.
Comparison with OlympusI've included some comparison images with my Olympus and the Olympus with the Helios lens. The Olympus produces sharper images, especially in the details.
Conclusion
The camera works flawlessly, with occasional focus issues, but nothing out of the ordinary. It lacks an electronic shutter, which is a drawback. For its age, it's a decent camera, suitable for daytime street photography.
Featured FAQ
What is the Panasonic Lumix's image quality like?The camera produces decent images with good color reproduction, but the resolution could be better.
Does the camera have any notable features?Yes, it has a rotating LCD screen, a simple menu system, and a button for the intelligent mode.
Is the camera suitable for low-light photography?No, it tends to produce noise in low-light conditions, especially with weak lighting.
Can I compare the camera's image quality with other models?Yes, I've included some comparison images with my Olympus and the Olympus with the Helios lens.
What are the camera's drawbacks?It lacks an electronic shutter and produces noise in low-light conditions.
Is the camera suitable for street photography?Yes, it's a decent camera for daytime street photography, considering its age.
