A Film That Left Me Puzzled - A Review

I Just Watched a Kirill Serebrennikov Film and I'm Still Trying to Figure Out What the Point Was

summarizeEditor's Summary

I recently watched a Kirill Serebrennikov film that left me feeling both intrigued and confused. While the director's attempt to create a thought-provoking film is commendable, the disjointed narrative and lack of cohesion ultimately fell flat. The film's use of dance and subtle suggestions to hint at the struggles of musicians was a welcome respite from the expected drama, but it wasn't enough to save the film from its overall disjointedness. I'm still trying to process what the film was trying to say, but unfortunately, it didn't quite hit the mark.

settingsSpecifications

KararKötü

Hikaye2/10

Kalite4/10

Müzik8/10

Görüntü5/10

KarakterGeliştirme3/10

A Disappointing Experience: My Thoughts on Kirill Serebrennikov's Film

I still remember the movie and I'm left feeling like I need a cigarette, just like Viktor Tsoi did in it. The film's impact lingers, but for all the wrong reasons.

A book that changed me forever? Highly recommended! But, unfortunately, this film is not one of them.

I want to thank Kirill Serebrennikov first. While I appreciate his attempt to create a thought-provoking film, I couldn't help but feel that it fell flat.

Firstly, thanks for not beating us over the head with the musicians' struggles. You could have taken the line of addiction and alcoholism among musicians back then and turned it into a drama. Instead, the filmmakers hinted at it with dance, unbridled laughter, and a few subtle suggestions.

However, these hints were not enough to save the film from its disjointed narrative. It's like a patchwork of random details that don't quite fit together. It's a bit like talking to a fashionista who's lost their thread - they might be wearing some super expensive, rare, and exclusive gear, but it all looks tacky and laughable when put together.

The film isn't about the characters, it's about showcasing Serebrennikov's genius and skill. The characters are just a means to an end, and they're not particularly well-developed. Take the word 'сейшн' for example - it's a bit of a stretch to think that it was really in vogue back in the day.

My initial impression of the film was that it felt utterly unreal. It's like watching a play, and the black-and-white cinematography only adds to the sense of artificiality. You know when you put something in quotes, it suddenly loses its reality? That's what the entire story feels like - like it's in quotes.

When the whole Ksenia Sobchak thing blew up, and people started defending Serebrennikov's honor, I saw some of my colleagues come out in support of him. They said he didn't steal anything, and that he's as pure as a pane of glass. The only sane comment I saw was from playwright Ivan Vyrypaev, who wrote an open letter to the protesters.

Friends, let's be honest with ourselves - Kirill Serebrennikov's arrest will likely go unpunished by the authorities in power today in Russia. I see how most of you wrote letters in support, attended rallies, gave interviews, and even reached out to the president. But, honestly, it's becoming a bit of a farce. Meanwhile, most of you continue making movies, putting on plays, and getting grants from the Ministry of Culture. By collaborating with this regime and thinking that our art and activism can somehow change this country or contribute to its transformation, we're just deceiving ourselves and our nation - and that's really quite childish.

I'm done here. I know there are plenty of artists who use their craft to promote themselves, their image, and their name. And so, it's getting boring to write about this.

I spent over two hours on this drivel, and I don't want those who glance at my review to waste more time understanding the simple truth - you should only watch this film with the same motivation you'd watch a concert by Olga Buzova - to see the caricatured art and naivety of its creator.

The only redeeming quality of the film is the music of the group 'КИНО'. It's what made the film. The soundtrack is catchy and memorable, but it's not enough to save the film from its overall lackluster experience.

What I didn't like.

Firstly, it was the abundance of bare male backsides. There was a scene with a one-year-old's bottom being fondled in a way that would make a pedophile jealous. It was disgusting. But, again, thanks for not showing the messy details.

And, yeah! What was the point of the guys spreading their cheeks during the draft board examination in the story about the band 'Кино'? What's the connection to the draft board, anyway?

Secondly, and most importantly, I didn't like how the film failed to capture the spirit of those times, their relationships, and the drive that led them to success. There's nothing of that in the film. The love story seems refined, like a gentle touch.

The film's trailer is way more dynamic and interesting than the film itself. In fact, the best parts of the film are all in the trailer. It's a shame, really, because the trailer had me excited for what the film had to offer.

I give it two stars for the music of the group 'КИНО'. It's what made the film.

By the way, if you're looking for a film that will leave you feeling confused and underwhelmed, then this is the film for you.

But, if you're looking for a film that will challenge your thoughts and leave you feeling inspired, then look elsewhere.

xa0

How I lost 16 kilograms in 8 months.

live_helpFeatured FAQ

What was the film's central theme or message?

Unfortunately, the film's disjointed narrative and lack of cohesion made it difficult to pinpoint a clear central theme or message. However, it seemed to be exploring the struggles of musicians and the impact of addiction and mental health on their lives.

Was the film's use of dance effective?

Yes, the film's use of dance was a highlight, adding a unique and captivating element to the narrative. It was a welcome respite from the expected drama and added a new layer of depth to the story.

Was the film's pacing uneven?

Yes, the film's pacing was uneven, with some scenes feeling rushed and others feeling drawn out. This made it difficult to become fully invested in the story and follow the narrative.

What did you think of the cast's performances?

The cast delivered strong performances, bringing depth and nuance to their characters. They were able to convey the complexities and emotions of their characters in a way that was believable and engaging.

Was the film's use of music effective?

Yes, the film's use of music was effective in setting the tone and mood. It added a new layer of depth to the story and helped to convey the emotions and themes of the film.

What did you think of the film's visuals?

The film's visuals were stunning, with beautiful cinematography and lighting. The film's use of color and composition was effective in creating a unique and captivating atmosphere.

Was the film's ending satisfying?

No, the film's ending was abrupt and unsatisfying. It felt like the story was cut off suddenly, without any resolution or conclusion.

Would you recommend this film?

Unfortunately, I wouldn't recommend this film. While it had some highlights, the disjointed narrative and lack of cohesion made it difficult to become fully invested in the story and follow the narrative.

What did you think of the film's themes?

The film's themes of addiction and mental health are timely and important. However, they were not fully explored or developed, making the film feel somewhat shallow.

check_circlePros

•The film's use of dance was a highlight, adding a unique and captivating element to the narrative
•The subtle suggestions of the musicians' struggles were a welcome respite from the expected drama
•The film's visuals were stunning, with beautiful cinematography and lighting
•The cast delivered strong performances, bringing depth and nuance to their characters
•The film's themes of addiction and mental health are timely and important
•The film's use of music was effective in setting the tone and mood
•The film's cinematography was impressive, with some beautiful shots of the city
•The cast's chemistry was undeniable, making their characters' relationships believable and engaging

cancelCons

•The disjointed narrative made it difficult to follow and become invested in the story
•The film's lack of cohesion and clarity made it hard to understand what the director was trying to say
•The pacing was uneven, with some scenes feeling rushed and others feeling drawn out
•The film's reliance on subtle suggestions and hints made it feel like it was missing a clear direction
•The film's themes and messages were not fully explored or developed
•The film's ending was abrupt and unsatisfying
•The film's characters felt somewhat one-dimensional, making it hard to connect with them
•The film's use of symbolism was confusing and didn't add much to the story