Choosing the Perfect Classic Skis for Year-Round Cruising
We're lucky to live in the Moscow region, where the cross-country skiing section trains in the winter. They always prepare a fantastic track for both skate and classic skiing, and if you venture deeper into the forest, you'll find a healthy trail perfect for traditional skiing.
Not everyone knows how to ski on classic skis, so a wide track is necessary. That's why most amateur skiers use classic skis.
Classic skis are different from skate skis. They're about 10-15 cm longer and softer, which allows for a bend in the boot zone to make contact with the snow and push off from it.
Classic skis can be either recreational (wider and heavier) or competitive. I've got three types of skis, and my husband's got them too. From left to right: recreational, classic, and skate skis.
I've already written about recreational skis here: Rossignol Recreational Skis
Now, let's talk about classic skis.
Product Characteristics
The Rossignol X-IUM CLASSIC WCS skis I'm reviewing are made in France and designed for classic skiing.
Purchased at Trial-Sport in 2012, these skis have been my husband's go-to choice for over a decade.
As of 15.01.2026, the price for a similar model from the 2025/2026 season is 18,000 rubles. Keep in mind that this is just for the skis themselves, no bindings or poles included.
The bindings we have are Rottefella and the cost depends on the model, starting from 2 thousand rubles.
These bindings are pretty easy to install, thanks to the special mounting platform on the skis. Just choose the bindings that match your platform configuration.
Our skis have the NIS platform, which is the most common one.
Let's break down those letters and numbers in the name. The X-IUM WCS marking on the skis means World Cup Series, or KUBKOVAIA SERIIA in Russian.
These skis are expert-level, made with new technologies tested on World Cup events.
High-performance skis for demanding athletes, featuring technologies proven on World Cup stages.
C2 is the ski profile designation, characterized by a medium-height camber in the middle, where the bindings are.The C2 profile has a medium-height camber and the same structure as C1. The C2 model is versatile and can be used with both hard and wax-based grip.
By comparison, S1 has a very small camber, while S3 has the largest.
The 'S' designation combined with the length indicates the skier's weight.
We have a length of 191 cm:
According to standard guidelines, skis are chosen based on height, using tables. My husband is 176 cm tall, and he needs skis that are 200 cm long.
But here's the thing! For classical skis, it's not just about height - weight matters too.
According to the table on the store's website, our C2 191 skis are suitable for athletes weighing 43-64 kg.
My husband weighs 78 kg. So, these skis aren't suitable for him in terms of height and weight, but he bought them on sale with a big discount, and his old skis (198 cm) weren't available at the time.
One thing I've noticed is that the skis under his boots flex more than mine. He's felt it and realized his mistake, but learned to deal with it.
He uses them on packed, groomed snow and they're fine. But on fresh powder, it's a struggle.
Another marking, R-GRIP, means the skis don't require wax for grip.
The wax zone on the back of the ski is also highlighted and marked.
Despite the marking, he still waxes this area. He thinks it helps with glide and likes doing it.
He's got two types of wax: glide and grip.
Classic skis usually need two types of wax. The entire surface gets glide wax, while the area under the boot gets grip wax.
Newer models have a special grip zone with a fabric-like coating, so no wax is needed.
Verdict
This Rossignol ski model is reliable and comfortable. My husband's been skiing for over 10 years and is happy with them.
Can't say the same for Madshus skis, though - they fell apart. He managed to fix them and used them for a bit longer: Madshus Biegowe Skis
He's got these boots: Rossignol X-6 SC COMBI Skating Boots
Overall, I'd recommend these skis to anyone looking for a reliable and comfortable classic skiing experience. Just keep in mind that they may not be suitable for skiers with a higher weight or those who prefer a more aggressive skiing style.
As for the price, it's a bit steep, but considering the quality and performance of these skis, it's worth the investment.
So, if you're in the market for a new pair of classic skis, I'd definitely consider the Rossignol X-IUM CLASSIC WCS. Just make sure to check the specifications and ensure they fit your needs.
Happy skiing!