What this cartoon is about.
In the Kyiv principality everything looked picture‑perfect. The heroes were basically on a never‑ending vacation, flirting with the ladies while their wives just waited for kids.
Then, on a “perfect” day, the ever‑present Julius whispered that the world was about to end, and chaos broke loose.
Три богатыря и свет клином Три богатыря и свет клиномMy take.The first three movies were so good I could watch them on repeat. The later ones? Just a miss and a mess.
Три богатыря и свет клиномKids who saw the original back in 2004 have now grown up and have kids of their own, while the heroine‑warriors are just starting families.
Why did they all get pregnant at once? Miracle IVF? Did the writers just follow a schedule? And seriously, why didn’t they use this plot device earlier?
Три богатыря и свет клиномЛюбава still looks like a little girl, basically a TV character who got pregnant at sixteen.
Три богатыря и свет клиномShe could've at least added a few wrinkles.
Три богатыря и свет клиномНастасья, being the oldest, should be the one babysitting grandkids.
Три богатыря и свет клиномBut she, just like the others, suddenly decides to think about kids on the same day. Maybe it’s a plot shortcut, or the writers figured the “heroes” now have to fill their world with stories about kids, grandkids, great‑grandkids… “Stay tuned for 2074: Alёsha Popovich’s grandson meets the Basurman dragon.” Три богатыря и свет клиномАлёнушка is basically a career‑driven diva who’s been starring in the “heroes” saga forever. Kids? Maybe they’ll bring in the cash.
Три богатыря и свет клиномAlright, I’m diving into a harsh critique. I’ve got a ton of questions about this franchise. The newest cartoon? It’s basically meaningless.
Everything feels recycled. There’s Kolivan, the guy who’s always trying to hand Kyiv over and loot the treasury. And, of course, the rogue Nightingale shows up again.
Три богатыря и свет клиномWe’ve seen all this before.
Then there’s Yulia, who constantly runs the country in place of the child‑king.
Три богатыря и свет клиномAnd the never‑aging heroes with their wives.
Три богатыря и свет клином
Три богатыря и свет клиномThe prince is still just a kid. And which Vladimir are they even talking about? Definitely not the one who Christianized Rus'.
Три богатыря и свет клиномEvery time I see Prince Vladimir, my irritation grows. Historically, 9th‑century Prince Vladimir could have been a symbol of wisdom and statecraft, not a petty, infantile power‑hog. Without the heroes, that kind of ruler would have sold out Rus' for a woman’s skirt ages ago.
Just so you know, back in 2014 they released a hero series called “Knight’s Move” that talked about taking Kyiv—almost like a prophecy for certain events.
Now they’ve got a 2025 cartoon with an end‑of‑the‑world vibe. I’m not reading too much into it, but the creators keep dropping hints. I’m not the one coming up with the themes, so no complaints there.
Три богатыря и свет клиномAs for the heroes themselves, the real ancient Russian warriors are enshrined as relics in the Kyiv Lavra caves. They were holy figures who, in their later years, devoted themselves to monastic life. While the epic tales are tough for modern kids to read, they do give a glimpse into those lives.
What do we get in the cartoon? Not much good. The characters slowly degrade, losing the distinct traits they once had. There’s nothing that sparks warm feelings or genuine connections to the real people of that era.
I agree: the cartoon is pure entertainment. It's fun, but does it have to be a satire of historical figures? What are we actually laughing at? Who's being mocked? Especially since the studio "Мельница" already made a decent cartoon about Prince Vladimir that never got finished because of internal disagreements. And can the "heroic" Prince Vladimir really lead people to the Dnieper? Could we even picture him as the first prince to unite the Slavic lands?
Три богатыря и свет клиномHere the heroes feel like a lucky break from the rule—random lottery winners. They always show up just in time to save the nation at the last second… and nobody learns anything.
Bottom line.
It’s not really a cartoon; it’s more like an endless kids' version of the “Ёлки” movies. The story gets weaker with each episode. You’d only put this on when you need the kid to wash the dishes and be distracted by the screen.
Три богатыря и свет клиномThe first three episodes are actually watchable as a family. “Алеша Попович” especially packs meaning, humor, and a moral. But what now? When does it end? Our film scene is stuck with two woes: every year we get another “Ёлки” and another “Богатыри”. The titles change, but the formula stays the same.
Bottom line: if by the end of 2026 we don’t see another “Богатыри” sequel, that would actually be a win for Russian cinema. The idea has completely run out of steam.
You can find more of my reviews in my profile