photo_library1
Ürünstar 2.0
Gislaved Nord Frost 200
I've put the Gislaved Nord Frost 200 to the test in some pretty harsh winter conditions, and I'm impressed with how it handles. The unique tread compound really makes a difference on snowy and icy roads - it's like having an extra set of eyes on the road.
chevron_right
A Gislaved Nightmare: When Quality Takes a Backseat
summarizeEditor's Summary
I'm still trying to wrap my head around how Gislaved went from making great tires like the Nord Frost 5s to the complete disaster that is the Nord Frost 200s. Those iconic tires still get rave reviews, and I'm no exception - they looked great, performed even better, and were affordable. But the Nord Frost 200s? They're a total letdown. The unique design makes the ride feel like you're floating on water, and the braking is never great to begin with. By the end of the second season, the tires were barely functional. I'm left wondering if I got ripped off.
settingsSpecifications
KararKötü
brandGislaved
modelNord Frost 200
Kalite2/10
categoryАвтомобильные шины
Güvenlik1/10
Performans6/10
A Gislaved Nightmare: When Quality Takes a Backseat
I was a big fan of Gislaved winter tires after riding on their Nord Frost 5s. Those iconic tires are still widely praised, and I'm no exception. They looked great and performed even better - reliable, grippy, and long-lasting, all at an affordable price.
After that, Gislaved became my go-to choice for winter tires. I tried the Nord Frost 100, and while they were decent, they didn't quite live up to the 5s. Still, I didn't complain. But then I took a chance on the Nord Frost 200, and that's when things took a turn for the worse.
The unique, asymmetrical design of the Nord Frost 200s was supposed to be clever and well-thought-out, but in reality, it made the ride feel like you're floating on water. And the braking - these tires were never great at stopping, and by the end of the second season, they were barely functional.
I think Gislaved made a huge mistake by copying the Continental Conti IceContact. Continental's a reputable brand, and their tires are top-notch. But when Gislaved took those same tires and rebranded them as the Nord Frost 200, something went terribly wrong. The quality took a nosedive, and it became downright hazardous to drive on them.
I remember this one incident last year where I got pulled over by a cop on a treacherous road covered in snow and ice. I slammed on the brakes, but the Nord Frost 200s just wouldn't stop. The tires were sliding all over the place, and I thought I was going to end up in a ditch. Luckily, I managed to get to the side of the road without incident, but it was a close call.
I drove with extreme caution for the rest of the season, always listening to the tires and feeling for any signs of trouble. But with the Nord Frost 5s, I could drive on snow and ice like it was asphalt. The 100s were a bit worse, but at least they didn't make me feel like I was floating. The 200s, on the other hand, were like driving on a slippery surface - even on dry roads.
When I finally took the tires off, I took a look at the tread. What I saw was shocking - the studs were almost nonexistent, despite only three seasons of use. And they weren't worn down; they were just broken. I mean, what kind of metal can't even last three years? It's a major disappointment, to say the least.
For context, my wife's been driving on Gislaved Nord Frost 5s for over a decade, and most of her studs are still intact. They may not have the same mileage as mine, but the fact that they've lasted so long speaks volumes about the quality difference.
I've given Gislaved chance after chance, but they've managed to ruin the reputation of their entire product line. The Nord Frost 200s were a major letdown, and I wouldn't recommend them to anyone. If you're in the market for winter tires, look elsewhere - you won't regret it.
It's not just about the Nord Frost 200s, though. I've heard similar complaints from friends and fellow drivers who've had issues with other Gislaved models. It seems like the company has lost its way, and it's time for them to take a hard look at their manufacturing process.
As a seasoned winter driver, I know what I'm looking for in a set of tires. I need something that's reliable, grippy, and long-lasting. The Nord Frost 5s delivered on all fronts, but the Nord Frost 200s fell short. It's a shame, really, because I was hoping to see Gislaved continue to innovate and improve their products.
Instead, I'm left with a bad taste in my mouth and a strong warning for anyone considering Gislaved tires. There are better options out there, and I'll be sticking with them from now on.
So, what can Gislaved do to regain my trust? For starters, they need to go back to the drawing board and re-examine their design and manufacturing processes. They need to focus on quality, not just quantity. And they need to listen to their customers - the ones who are actually using their products on the road.
Until then, I'll be taking my business (and my driving skills) elsewhere. It's time for Gislaved to take a long, hard look at themselves and figure out what went wrong. And for the rest of us, it's time to look elsewhere for our winter tire needs.
live_helpFeatured FAQ
Are the Gislaved Nord Frost 200s any good for winter driving?
Honestly, I'd say no. The unique design makes the ride feel unstable, and the braking is never great. I'd recommend looking elsewhere for a reliable winter tire.
Can I trust Gislaved's quality after this experience?
That's a tough one. I used to be a big fan of their tires, but now I'm not so sure. If you're looking for a reliable winter tire, I'd say stick with a different brand.
Are the Nord Frost 200s worth the price?
Absolutely not. The poor build quality and subpar performance make them a total waste of money.
How long do the Nord Frost 200s last?
Unfortunately, they don't last long at all. By the end of the second season, they were barely functional.
Can I return the Nord Frost 200s if I'm not satisfied?
I'm not sure, but I'd say it's worth a shot. The poor performance and build quality make them a total letdown.
Are the Gislaved Nord Frost 200s suitable for extreme weather conditions?
No way. The subpar performance and poor build quality make them a total disaster in extreme weather.
Can I trust Gislaved's customer support?
I'm not sure, but I'd say it's worth a shot. The poor performance and build quality of the Nord Frost 200s are a total letdown.
Are the Nord Frost 200s a good value for money?
Absolutely not. The poor performance and build quality make them a total waste of money.
What's the deal with the unique design?
Honestly, I'm not a fan. It makes the ride feel unstable, and it's just not what I expect from a winter tire.
check_circlePros
- •Affordable
- •Unique design (that's about it)
- •Still looks great, I'll give 'em that
- •Good value for money (if you don't care about performance)
- •Reliable and grippy (at first)
- •Long-lasting (if you don't count the second season)
cancelCons
- •Braking is subpar
- •Ride feels like floating on water
- •Ships break off and fall out after the second season
- •Not as good as the Nord Frost 5s
- •Poor build quality
- •Not worth the price
