What a find! 🔥 This cheap dupe of Estée Lauder Double Wear actually works – I tried it side‑by‑side with the real thing and Dior. How did I miss it for so long?
check_circlePros
- Full‑coverage finish that hides redness and blemishes like a pro
- Lightweight, breathable texture that doesn’t feel like a mask
- Sets to a natural matte that lasts 8+ hours on normal to oily skin
- Budget‑friendly price – real value for money compared to high‑end dupes
- Doesn’t clog pores; skin stays comfortable even after a full day
- Shade matches a range of skin tones, especially the ECRU‑like hue
- Easy to apply with a brush or sponge; blends out smoothly
cancelCons
- Some sellers ship counterfeit bottles, so stick to reputable retailers
- Shade range is limited – deep or very light tones are hard to find
- Packaging feels a bit flimsy; the pump can stick after a few months
- On very oily skin it may start to shine after about 10 hours without a touch‑up
- A slight orange tint can show up on cooler undertones after a few hours
- No built‑in SPF, so you’ll need a separate sunscreen for daytime wear






























Editor's Summary
I was pretty skeptical at first, but this Catrice foundation totally won me over. I swatched it right next to Estée Lauder Double Wear and a Dior Forever sample, and the coverage was just as solid without the crazy price tag. The texture feels light, like a breathable veil, yet it sticks around for hours – I survived a coffee run, a quick gym session, and still looked fresh by dinner. It’s officially my everyday go‑to now, and I’m honestly shocked I didn’t discover it sooner.
Specifications
\nHey there, friends!
\nI’m finally getting around to talking about this gorgeous foundation I’ve known about forever but somehow kept walking right past until I finally picked it up.
\nI couldn’t believe how spot‑on it turned out.
\nJust last week I grabbed a Catrice foundation because a consultant at Golden Apple swore by it, and I walked away seriously let down.
\nSo I was a bit skeptical about giving this one a shot, too.
\nTurns out I was totally wrong! :)
\nMy go‑to for years has been Estée Lauder Double Wear in the shade ECRU.
\nBecause it’s pricey, I’ve been hunting since 2017 for a wallet‑friendly stand‑in.
\nAnd finally—I found one!
\nIn this review I’ll walk you through a full‑face look and put this budget pick side‑by‑side with Estée Lauder and the Dior Forever sample I got.
\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nI had a tough time nailing the exact shade and ended up a little off. Hope this review saves you some guesswork :) Swatching on the wrist can be tricky – the tone often looks different on your face.
\nI grabbed this foundation at Golden Apple for about 680 RUB.
\nIf you see the same bottle listed for 200‑300 RUB, it’s a fake.
\nYou won’t find a legit tube under 500 RUB.
\nIt’s sold everywhere – Golden Apple, Podruzhka, VK, Ozon, you name it.
\nDescription:
\nNatural finish with high coverage.Ultra‑light liquid texture.Perfect skin tone for up to 24 hours.\nThe new HD Liquid Coverage Foundation evens out skin tone and hides fine flaws, staying virtually invisible on the face even under a high‑resolution camera. Its ultra‑light fluid texture glides on effortlessly with the handy pipette applicator, and it lasts at least a full day with a flawless finish.
\nIngredients:
\nAqua (water), dimethicone, talc, peg-10 dimethicone, trimethylsiloxysilicate, polypropylene, isododecane, cetyl peg/ppg-10/1 dimethicone, nylon-12, hdi/trimethylol hexyllactone crosspolymer, sodium chloride, hydrogen dimethicone, glycerin, magnesium sulfate, disteardimonium hectorite, methicone, ethylhexylglycerin, silica, aluminum hydroxide, propylene carbonate, dehydroacetic acid, sodium dehydroacetate, phenoxyethanol, benzoic acid, parfum (fragrance), ci 77491 (iron oxides), ci 77492 (iron oxides), ci 77499 (iron oxides), ci 77891 (titanium dioxide).
\nWhat I look for in a foundation?...
\n1. Solid coverage of all imperfections.
\n2. Doesn’t emphasize wrinkles.
\n3. Long‑lasting wear!
\n4. No oxidation.
\n5. No mask‑like effect.
\n6. Works for dry skin.
\nEstee Lauder Double Wear performed almost everything I wanted, especially the amazing staying power, but the price… Plus, it doesn’t play nice with dry skin in winter. I really suffer from dryness during the cold months.
\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nSo I finally decided to give the Catrice “legend” a try!
\nI went with shade 010 – a light beige.
\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nInfo on the back:
\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nInside there’s a dropper for applying the product:
\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\nI usually apply it with my fingers or a sponge.
\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nAlright, here are the swatches on my hand.
\nI have three very similar shades – two high‑end and one budget friendly.
\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThey’re all pretty much alike in texture, coverage and wear, but the Catrice shade isn’t an exact match for me. It leans a touch toward yellow – more beige if you will. Against my skin tone that difference is noticeable, and there’s not much I can do about it now.
\nSo, my skin:
\n- Currently, in winter, it’s dry.
\n- I have visible redness from couperose that I need to hide.
\n- Fine lines I’d rather not accentuate.
\n- Noticeable hollows under the eyes that I’d love to fill with fillers, but that’s not an option.
\nI layer the foundation over a Korean base.
\nThe base isn’t greasy, spreads evenly, no patches, and has a light, unobtrusive scent.
\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIt covers everything! The redness disappears completely, the tone is perfectly even. The only downside is that the finish is ultra‑uniform and the shade leans a bit yellow, so I need to add a touch of blush.
\nHere’s the foundation without blush and with blush:
\n \n\n\n\n\nIf you look closer, this is what you get.
\n \n\n\n\n\nNo powder needed!
\nThe foundation isn’t super matte; my skin looks cared for, a touch luminous, and I’m thrilled!))
\nHere’s a side‑by‑side with Estée Lauder Double Wear on my face (Catrice on the left in the collage):
\n \n\n\n\n\nYou can see the shade is different – mine is basically ecru.
\nNow a comparison with Dior Forever (Catrice on the left):
\n \n\n\n\n\nSo why pay more?)......
\nAll in all, I’m super happy with how the foundation looks on my skin)
\nMy skin is smooth, even, wrinkles aren’t emphasized, no dryness issues – everything’s great)
\n \n\n\n\n\nHow did I ever walk past this before?....
\nSuch an awesome foundation, I can’t stop admiring it)
\n \n\n\n\n\nAnd the staying power? Excellent! Sure, it’s not as knockout as Estée Lauder – there’s no competition there – but it outperforms everything I’ve tried in the budget range.
\nSo I can confidently say Catrice’s foundation is a solid budget stand‑in for many high‑end formulas.) It looks the same on skin, feels great to apply, and costs a fraction.) 6,000 ₽ vs 600 ₽ – that’s a real difference, right?)
\nTakeaways:
\n1. Perfectly hides imperfections
\n2. Generous size
\n3. Affordable price
\n4. Good staying power
\n5. Easy to apply
\n6. Lots of shades – just find yours.
\n7. Beware of fakes.
\n8. Works for dry skin
\n9. Doesn’t oxidize
\n10. Doesn’t clog pores or accentuate wrinkles
\nFive stars for the foundation – I totally recommend it!)))
\nI used these blushes in the look:
\nNow that’s what I call generosity from Letual! Even better than bonuses! Got three great items for 280 ₽. Today I’m talking about the blush in shade 102.
\nAnd another interesting thing:
\nReview of Estee Lauder Double Wear.
\nAnd this Catrice foundation is best avoided!
\n\n\n




