28 Years Later. Temple of Bones Review: A Disappointing Sequel

A Jarring Film That Even Great Acting Can't Save: '28 Years Later. Temple of Bones' Falls Flat

summarizeEditor's Summary

I was really looking forward to '28 Years Later. Temple of Bones', but unfortunately, it didn't live up to my expectations. The film's plot is vague and unfulfilling, and the story feels unfinished. Even with great acting from Rafe Finnes and the rest of the cast, the movie can't make up for its lack of direction. If you're a fan of the franchise, you might be disappointed by the lack of originality and the poor build upon the previous films. The '28 Days Later' series has been around for a while, and it's clear that this installment is a step back. I'd say '28 Years Later. Temple of Bones' is a total letdown, and it's not worth watching if you're expecting a solid addition to the series.

settingsSpecifications

KararKötü

Hikaye3/10

Kalite4/10

Oyunculuk9/10

Görünüm6/10

I've seen my fair share of movies, but '28 Years Later. Temple of Bones' left me shaken.

Click here to find out more about this film.

The '28 Days Later' franchise has been around for a while, and I've got to say, the first film was a masterpiece. Cillian Murphy's performance was incredible, and it set the bar high for the rest of the series.

The second installment, '28 Weeks Later', was also good, but it lacked the originality of the first film.

Fast forward to the third installment, '28 Days Later: The Waiting', which was a complete disaster. It was poorly made, brutal, and just plain disturbing.

So, when I heard about the new film, '28 Years Later. Temple of Bones', I was skeptical. And let me tell you, my skepticism was justified.

The film is a continuation of the franchise, but it feels like a mess. The plot is vague and unfulfilling, and the story feels unfinished.

The acting, however, is top-notch. Rafe Finnes is incredible as Dr. Kelson, and the rest of the cast is on point. But even with great acting, the film can't make up for its shortcomings.

The violence is gratuitous and disturbing, and it feels like the filmmakers are trying to shock the audience rather than tell a coherent story.

I've got to give it up for Alfie Williams as Spike, the kid who's just trying to survive in this crazy world. He's got some great scenes, but they get lost in the chaos of the film.

Overall, I wouldn't recommend watching this movie. It's too violent and graphic, and it's just not worth the time.

So, I'm giving it a solid 0 stars and a thumbs down. We don't need this kind of content.

About the film

Production year - 2026

Country - United Kingdom, USA

Genre - Horror

Age rating - 18+

Duration - 1 hr 49 min

The film is a continuation of the '28 Days Later' franchise, and it's the third installment in the series. It's a zombie apocalypse movie, but it feels like a mess.

The plot is vague and unfulfilling, and the story feels unfinished. The acting is top-notch, but it can't make up for the film's shortcomings.

I was surprised to see the protagonist befriend the biggest and strongest zombie in the area. It was a weird moment, but it added some depth to the film.

The film takes place in a post-apocalyptic world where zombies are aggressive, fast, and nearly impossible to take down. The protagonist, Dr. Kelson, is a hermit who's building a city out of bones in memory of the fallen.

One of the things that didn't sit well with me about the movie was the violence. It's gratuitous and disturbing, and it feels like the filmmakers are trying to shock the audience rather than tell a coherent story.

I've got to give it up for Alfie Williams as Spike, the kid who's just trying to survive in this crazy world. At some point, he finds himself caught between two strong characters, between two seasoned survivors, with a trail of bones leading behind them.

But even with great acting, the film can't make up for its shortcomings. The plot is incredibly vague and unfulfilling, and the story feels unfinished.

So, I wouldn't recommend watching this movie. It's too violent and graphic, and it's just not worth the time.

That's why I'm giving it a solid 0 stars and a thumbs down. We don't need this kind of content.

What I liked.

Acting. The film brings together a talented cast.

Rafe Finnes is incredibly convincing as Dr. Kelson. Sometimes it's hard to tell if his character is a genius or completely lost his mind.

But the way Dr. Kelson looks to the future, even in the midst of all this chaos, and tries to find a little bit of humanity in the bloodthirsty zombies, is genuinely moving.

Jack O'Connell does a great job as Jimmy, a would-be preacher who's convinced he's on a new mission. He's gathered a small group of kids who've grown up in this crazy world and is encouraging them to commit acts of cruelty, all in the name of his father's vision. But as we learn more about his past, his true intentions become clear.

I've got to give it up for Alfie Williams as Spike - the kid who's just trying to survive in this crazy world. At some point, he finds himself caught between two strong characters, between two seasoned survivors, with a trail of bones leading behind them.

You can't ignore the acting chops of Chi Lewis Parr.

And the rest of the cast is on point.

What didn't sit well with me about the movie.

It's ridiculously violent. Like, some scenes are straight-up disturbing. There were a few times I wanted to turn it off. I just didn't get the point of all the gore. Was it just to shock the audience?

Now, I get that the previous movie was dark, but it still had some heart - it was about growing up, finding yourself, and trying to save the people you care about. But this one takes it to a whole different level.

But the story still feels unfinished. The return of a character from the first movie is a clear hint that there's more to come. But do we really need it? That's a big question.

I'd say that as a continuation of the zombie franchise, this movie and the previous third installment fall short of the original concept.

Maybe they would have fared better if they were presented as a standalone story.

But even with the over-the-top violence, it's hard to shake off the feeling that it's all just a mess.

The plot is incredibly vague and unfulfilling. It's just another unfinished story that left me underwhelmed.

Not even the excellent acting could make up for the movie's shortcomings.

So, I wouldn't recommend watching this movie. It's just too violent and graphic. There's so much of it that even the good parts get lost in the chaos.

That's why I'm giving it a solid 0 stars and a thumbs down. We don't need this kind of content.

live_helpFeatured FAQ

Is '28 Years Later. Temple of Bones' worth watching if I'm a fan of the franchise?

Unfortunately, I'd say no. The film lacks originality and builds poorly upon the previous films. If you're a fan of the series, you might be disappointed by the lack of direction and the poor execution.

What's the plot of '28 Years Later. Temple of Bones'?

The film's plot is vague and unfulfilling, and the story feels unfinished. I won't give away too many spoilers, but let's just say it's a continuation of the franchise that fails to deliver.

Is the acting in '28 Years Later. Temple of Bones' any good?

Yes, the acting is top-notch. Rafe Finnes and the rest of the cast do a great job of bringing their characters to life. Unfortunately, even their great performances can't make up for the film's lack of direction.

Is '28 Years Later. Temple of Bones' a scary movie?

While the film has a few intense and suspenseful moments, I wouldn't say it's a scary movie per se. It's more of a thought-provoking thriller that fails to deliver on its promise.

Can I return '28 Years Later. Temple of Bones' if I don't like it?

I'm not sure if you can return the film, but I'd say it's worth checking out the streaming options or renting it before committing to a purchase. Unfortunately, I think you'll find that it's a total letdown.

Is '28 Years Later. Temple of Bones' available to stream?

I'm not sure, but I'd check out your favorite streaming services to see if they have it available. If not, you might be able to rent it or purchase it through a digital store.

What's the runtime of '28 Years Later. Temple of Bones'?

I'm not sure, but I'd check the film's page on IMDB or a streaming service to get the exact runtime.

Is '28 Years Later. Temple of Bones' a good representation of the '28 Days Later' franchise?

Unfortunately, no. The film lacks originality and builds poorly upon the previous films. If you're a fan of the series, you might be disappointed by the lack of direction and the poor execution.